Tortillas Are Not Empowering

    Sandra Cisneros clearly acknowledges that boys and girls are often raised differently, but she indicates that they shouldn't be, or that the differences shouldn't be what they are. Her characters tend to speak of marriage as a goal of sorts (26), as if it is the only way to escape their current lives; from other vignettes it appears that the girls are raised to think this way, so that their only ambition is marriage. This is demonstrated on page 31:

"A woman's place is sleeping so she can wake up early with the tortilla star [...] Alicia, whose mama died, is sorry there is no one older to rise and make the lunchbox tortillas."

The statement about a woman's place seems to come at least in part from Alicia's father; Alicia is a university student, pursuing this path because she does not want to be limited to taking care of her family for the rest of her life. She is given the responsibility of making the tortillas because her mother is no longer around to do it, and her father probably leaves it to her because he considers it women's work. Her father also disapproves of her life as a student, presumably because it means she will spend less time doing the things women are "supposed" to do, and that she has ambitions apart from getting married. The implication is that a boy in that situation would not be disapproved of, that the choice to attend university would then show initiative. Cisneros's tone in the vignette indicates that she finds this double standard unfair, that at least this differentiation between the genders should not stand.
    In the vignette "Beautiful & Cruel", Esperanza (Cisneros's protagonist) refers to marriage as "the ball and chain" and talks about a common female character in movies who is "beautiful and cruel". This woman is in control of what power she has, and uses it to maintain her independence from men without barring them from her life completely. But more telling are the words Esperanza uses to summarize her goal to be this type of woman:

"I am one who leaves the table like a man, without putting back the chair or picking up the plate." (89)

More than any other words in this vignette, this sentence speaks of the gender roles imposed on Esperanza and others like her. It is expected, or even required, that a woman clean up after herself--perhaps in more places than just the table mentioned here--but a man is actually expected not to do this. Therefore, if Esperanza leaves the table without cleaning up after herself, she is behaving "like a man". Does Cisneros approve of this distinction? It appears that she doesn't; her protagonist certainly ignores it, anyway, at least to the point of not obeying it, although it remains present enough for her to feel that it's worth mentioning. Esperanza is shown to find many of the imposed gender roles of her society unfair, both here and in other vignettes; while a character that serves simply as a mouthpiece for one's views usually seems more flat than Esperanza, it is unlikely that Cisneros is not in at least some agreement. After all, it's quite a challenge to write from the point of view of someone who thinks completely differently from oneself.
    It's quite clear that Sandra Cisneros does not think that boys and girls should not be rised differently, at least not in the ways outlined in the vignettes. The only question remaining is, do you?